Syria is a terror state. It didn’t become that way overnight because of the Arab Spring or the Iraq War.
Its people are not the victims of American foreign policy, Islamic militancy or any of the other fashionable excuses. They supported Islamic terrorism. Millions of them still do.
They are not the Jews fleeing a Nazi Holocaust. They are the Nazis trying to relocate from a bombed out Berlin.
These are the cold hard facts.
ISIS took over parts of Syria because its government willingly allied with it to help its terrorists kill Americans in Iraq. That support for Al Qaeda helped lead to the civil war tearing the country apart.
The Syrians were not helpless, apathetic pawns in this fight. They supported Islamic terrorism.
A 2007 poll showed that 77% of Syrians supported financing Islamic terrorists including Hamas and the Iraqi fighters who evolved into ISIS. Less than 10% of Syrians opposed their terrorism.
Why did Syrians support Islamic terrorism? Because they hated America.
Sixty-three percent wanted to refuse medical and humanitarian assistance from the United States. An equal number didn’t want any American help caring for Iraqi refugees in Syria.
The vast majority of Syrians turned down any form of assistance from the United States because they hated us. They still do. Just because they’re willing to accept it now, doesn’t mean they like us.
If we bring Syrian Muslims to America, we will be importing a population that hates us.
The terrorism poll numbers are still ugly. A poll this summer found that 1 in 5 Syrians supports ISIS. A third of Syrians support the Al Nusra Front, which is affiliated with Al Qaeda. Since Sunnis are 3/4rs of the population and Shiites and Christians aren’t likely to support either group, this really means that Sunni Muslim support for both terror groups is even higher than these numbers make it seem.
And even though Christians and Yazidis are the ones who actually face ISIS genocide, Obama has chosen to take in few Christians and Yazidis. Instead 98.6% of Obama’s Syrian refugees are Sunni Muslims.
This is also the population most likely to support ISIS and Al Qaeda.
But these numbers are even worse than they look. Syrian men are more likely to view ISIS positively than women. This isn’t surprising as the Islamic State not only practices sex slavery, but has some ruthless restrictions for women that exceed even those of Saudi Arabia. (Al Qaeda’s Al Nusra Front, however, mostly closes the gender gap getting equal support from Syrian men and women.)
ISIS, however, gets its highest level of support from young men. This is the Syrian refugee demographic.
In the places where the Syrian refugees come from, support for Al Qaeda groups climbs as high as 70% in Idlib, 66% in Quneitra, 66% in Raqqa, 47% in Derzor, 47% in Hasakeh, 41% in Daraa and 41% in Aleppo.
Seventy percent support for ISIS in Raqqa has been dismissed as the result of fear. But if Syrians in the ISIS capital were just afraid of the Islamic State, why would the Al Nusra Front, which ISIS is fighting, get nearly as high a score from the people in Raqqa? The answer is that their support for Al Qaeda is real.
Apologists will claim that these numbers don’t apply to the Syrian refugees. It’s hard to say how true that is. Only 13% of Syrian refugees will admit to supporting ISIS, though that number still means that of Obama’s first 10,000 refugees, 1,300 will support ISIS. But the poll doesn’t delve into their views of other Al Qaeda groups, such as the Al Nusra Front, which usually gets more Sunni Muslim support.
And there’s no sign that they have learned to reject Islamic terrorism and their hatred for America.
When Syrian refugees were asked to list the greatest threat, 29 percent picked Iran, 22 percent picked Israel and 19 percent picked America. Only 10 percent viewed Islamic terrorism as a great threat.
By way of comparison, twice as many Iraqis see Islamic terrorism as a threat than Syrians do and slightly more Palestinian Arabs view Islamic terrorism as a threat than Syrians do. These are terrible numbers.
Thirty-seven percent of Syrian refugees oppose US airstrikes on ISIS. 33% oppose the objective of destroying ISIS.
And these are the people whom our politicians would have us believe are “fleeing an ISIS Holocaust.”
Seventy-three percent of Syrian refugees view US foreign policy negatively. That’s a higher number than Iraqis. It’s about equal to that of Palestinian Arabs.
They don’t like us. They really don’t like us.
Obama’s first shipment of Syrians will include 1,300 ISIS supporters and most of the rest will hate this country. But unless they’re stupid enough to announce that during their interviews, the multi-layered vetting that Obama and other politicians boast about will be useless.
It only took 2 Muslim refugees to carry out the Boston Marathon massacre. It only took 19 Muslim terrorists to carry out 9/11.
If only 1 percent of those 1,300 Syrian ISIS supporters put their beliefs into practice, they can still kill thousands of Americans.
And that’s a best case scenario. Because it doesn’t account for how many thousands of them support Al Qaeda. It doesn’t account for how many of them back other Islamic terrorist groups such as Hamas that had widespread support in Syria.
While the media has shamelessly attempted to exploit the Holocaust to rally support for Syrian migrants, the majority of Syrians supported Hamas whose mandate is finishing Hitler’s work. The Hamas charter describes a “struggle against the Jews” that culminates in another Holocaust. Bringing Hamas supporters to America will lead to more Muslim Supremacist violence against Jews in this country.
But all of this can be avoided by taking in genuine Syrian refugees.
While Obama insists on taking in fake Syrian refugees, mainly Sunni Muslims from UN camps who support terrorism and are not endangered in Jordan or Turkey, both Sunni countries, he is neglecting the real refugees, Christians and Yazidis, who are stateless and persecuted in the Muslim world.
Instead of taking in fake refugees who hate us, we should be taking in real refugees who need us.
Obama and Paul Ryan have claimed that a “religious test” for refugees is wrong, but religious tests are how we determine whether a refugee is really fleeing persecution or is just an economic migrant.
The Sunni Muslims that Obama is taking in do not face persecution. They are the majority. They are the persecutors. It’s the Yazidis and the Christians who need our help. And these real refugees, unlike the fake Sunni Muslim refugees, are not coming here to kill us. They truly have nowhere else to go.
Syria is a disaster because its rival Muslim religious groups are unable to get along with each other. Bringing them to this country will only spread the violence from their land to ours. Instead of taking in the religious majority that caused this mess through its intolerance, we should take in their victims; the Christians and Yazidis who are being slaughtered and enslaved by ISIS.
During the entire Syrian Civil War, Obama has only taken in 1 Syrian Yazidi and 53 Christians.
It’s time that we had a refugee policy that protected the persecuted, instead of their Muslim persecutors. It’s time that we listened to Syrian Christians in this country who oppose bringing tens of thousands of Syrian Muslims to terrorize their neighborhoods the way that they are already terrorizing Syrian Christians in Germany.
Syrian Muslims are a nation of terrorist supporters. They destroyed their own country. Let’s not let them destroy ours.
It’s time that we kept our nation safe by doing the right thing. Let’s take in the real Christian and Yazidi refugees and let the fake Sunni Muslim refugees and terrorist supporters stay in their own countries.
Its people are not the victims of American foreign policy, Islamic militancy or any of the other fashionable excuses. They supported Islamic terrorism. Millions of them still do.They are not the Jews fleeing a Nazi Holocaust. They are the Nazis trying to relocate from a bombed out Berlin.
These are the cold hard facts.
ISIS took over parts of Syria because its government willingly allied with it to help its terrorists kill Americans in Iraq. That support for Al Qaeda helped lead to the civil war tearing the country apart.
The Syrians were not helpless, apathetic pawns in this fight. They supported Islamic terrorism.
A 2007 poll showed that 77% of Syrians supported financing Islamic terrorists including Hamas and the Iraqi fighters who evolved into ISIS. Less than 10% of Syrians opposed their terrorism.
Why did Syrians support Islamic terrorism? Because they hated America.
Sixty-three percent wanted to refuse medical and humanitarian assistance from the United States. An equal number didn’t want any American help caring for Iraqi refugees in Syria.
The vast majority of Syrians turned down any form of assistance from the United States because they hated us. They still do. Just because they’re willing to accept it now, doesn’t mean they like us.
If we bring Syrian Muslims to America, we will be importing a population that hates us.
The terrorism poll numbers are still ugly. A poll this summer found that 1 in 5 Syrians supports ISIS. A third of Syrians support the Al Nusra Front, which is affiliated with Al Qaeda. Since Sunnis are 3/4rs of the population and Shiites and Christians aren’t likely to support either group, this really means that Sunni Muslim support for both terror groups is even higher than these numbers make it seem.
And even though Christians and Yazidis are the ones who actually face ISIS genocide, Obama has chosen to take in few Christians and Yazidis. Instead 98.6% of Obama’s Syrian refugees are Sunni Muslims.
This is also the population most likely to support ISIS and Al Qaeda.
But these numbers are even worse than they look. Syrian men are more likely to view ISIS positively than women. This isn’t surprising as the Islamic State not only practices sex slavery, but has some ruthless restrictions for women that exceed even those of Saudi Arabia. (Al Qaeda’s Al Nusra Front, however, mostly closes the gender gap getting equal support from Syrian men and women.)
ISIS, however, gets its highest level of support from young men. This is the Syrian refugee demographic.
In the places where the Syrian refugees come from, support for Al Qaeda groups climbs as high as 70% in Idlib, 66% in Quneitra, 66% in Raqqa, 47% in Derzor, 47% in Hasakeh, 41% in Daraa and 41% in Aleppo.
Seventy percent support for ISIS in Raqqa has been dismissed as the result of fear. But if Syrians in the ISIS capital were just afraid of the Islamic State, why would the Al Nusra Front, which ISIS is fighting, get nearly as high a score from the people in Raqqa? The answer is that their support for Al Qaeda is real.
Apologists will claim that these numbers don’t apply to the Syrian refugees. It’s hard to say how true that is. Only 13% of Syrian refugees will admit to supporting ISIS, though that number still means that of Obama’s first 10,000 refugees, 1,300 will support ISIS. But the poll doesn’t delve into their views of other Al Qaeda groups, such as the Al Nusra Front, which usually gets more Sunni Muslim support.
And there’s no sign that they have learned to reject Islamic terrorism and their hatred for America.
When Syrian refugees were asked to list the greatest threat, 29 percent picked Iran, 22 percent picked Israel and 19 percent picked America. Only 10 percent viewed Islamic terrorism as a great threat.
By way of comparison, twice as many Iraqis see Islamic terrorism as a threat than Syrians do and slightly more Palestinian Arabs view Islamic terrorism as a threat than Syrians do. These are terrible numbers.
Thirty-seven percent of Syrian refugees oppose US airstrikes on ISIS. 33% oppose the objective of destroying ISIS.
And these are the people whom our politicians would have us believe are “fleeing an ISIS Holocaust.”
Seventy-three percent of Syrian refugees view US foreign policy negatively. That’s a higher number than Iraqis. It’s about equal to that of Palestinian Arabs.
They don’t like us. They really don’t like us.
Obama’s first shipment of Syrians will include 1,300 ISIS supporters and most of the rest will hate this country. But unless they’re stupid enough to announce that during their interviews, the multi-layered vetting that Obama and other politicians boast about will be useless.
It only took 2 Muslim refugees to carry out the Boston Marathon massacre. It only took 19 Muslim terrorists to carry out 9/11.
If only 1 percent of those 1,300 Syrian ISIS supporters put their beliefs into practice, they can still kill thousands of Americans.
And that’s a best case scenario. Because it doesn’t account for how many thousands of them support Al Qaeda. It doesn’t account for how many of them back other Islamic terrorist groups such as Hamas that had widespread support in Syria.
While the media has shamelessly attempted to exploit the Holocaust to rally support for Syrian migrants, the majority of Syrians supported Hamas whose mandate is finishing Hitler’s work. The Hamas charter describes a “struggle against the Jews” that culminates in another Holocaust. Bringing Hamas supporters to America will lead to more Muslim Supremacist violence against Jews in this country.
But all of this can be avoided by taking in genuine Syrian refugees.
While Obama insists on taking in fake Syrian refugees, mainly Sunni Muslims from UN camps who support terrorism and are not endangered in Jordan or Turkey, both Sunni countries, he is neglecting the real refugees, Christians and Yazidis, who are stateless and persecuted in the Muslim world.
Instead of taking in fake refugees who hate us, we should be taking in real refugees who need us.
Obama and Paul Ryan have claimed that a “religious test” for refugees is wrong, but religious tests are how we determine whether a refugee is really fleeing persecution or is just an economic migrant.
The Sunni Muslims that Obama is taking in do not face persecution. They are the majority. They are the persecutors. It’s the Yazidis and the Christians who need our help. And these real refugees, unlike the fake Sunni Muslim refugees, are not coming here to kill us. They truly have nowhere else to go.
Syria is a disaster because its rival Muslim religious groups are unable to get along with each other. Bringing them to this country will only spread the violence from their land to ours. Instead of taking in the religious majority that caused this mess through its intolerance, we should take in their victims; the Christians and Yazidis who are being slaughtered and enslaved by ISIS.
During the entire Syrian Civil War, Obama has only taken in 1 Syrian Yazidi and 53 Christians.
It’s time that we had a refugee policy that protected the persecuted, instead of their Muslim persecutors. It’s time that we listened to Syrian Christians in this country who oppose bringing tens of thousands of Syrian Muslims to terrorize their neighborhoods the way that they are already terrorizing Syrian Christians in Germany.
Syrian Muslims are a nation of terrorist supporters. They destroyed their own country. Let’s not let them destroy ours.
It’s time that we kept our nation safe by doing the right thing. Let’s take in the real Christian and Yazidi refugees and let the fake Sunni Muslim refugees and terrorist supporters stay in their own countries.
Comments
Great article and absolutely correct.
ReplyDeleteThere are murderous thugs killing people. To stop the killing you take the killers home with you. HOW DUMB CAN YOU GET????
ReplyDeleteOh there you go, Sultan, making sense again.
ReplyDeleteA poll by the Arab Center for Research and Policy Studies surveyed 900 refugees in what it called “the largest public opinion poll conducted in the Arab region”, and found that 10-13% of displaced Syrian's have mixed feelings towards terror groups such as ISIS,
ReplyDeleteLet’s take in the real Christian and Yazidi refugees and let the fake Sunni Muslim refugees and terrorist supporters stay in their own countries...I couldn't agree more, but how do we convince Obama and those morons on the left other than tying them down, pinning open their eyelids, and forcing them to read articles such as this one?
ReplyDeleteWhenever I see statistics that come from Muslims, I automatically inflate them AGAINST America, due to the fact as stated here that they inherently hate America, and possibly even more scary, they always are practicing the Islamic doctrine of Taqiyya, or lying to further to cause of Islam. Everyone, Beware of the lying Muslim.
ReplyDeleteThe Immigration and Nationality Act passed June 27, 1952 revised the laws relating to immigration, naturalization, and nationality for the United States. That act, which became Public Law 414, established both the law and the intent of Congress regarding the immigration of Aliens to the US and remains in effect today. Among the many issues it covers, one in particular, found in Chapter 2 Section 212, is the prohibition of entry to the US if the Alien belongs to an organization seeking to overthrow the government of the United States by "force, violence, or other unconstitutional means." This, by its very definition, rules out Islamic immigration to the United States, but this law is being ignored by the White House.Islamic immigration to the US would be prohibited under this law because the Koran, Sharia Law and the Hadith all require complete submission to Islam, which is antithetical to the US government, the Constitution, and to the Republic. All Muslims who attest that the Koran is their life's guiding principal subscribe to submission to Islam and its form of government. Now the political correct crowd would say that Islamists cannot be prohibited from entering the US because Islam is a religion. Whether it is a religion is immaterial because the law states that Aliens who are affiliated with any "organization" that advocates the overthrow of our government are prohibited."
ReplyDeleteThat law would only be applicable if the refugees were in fact planning to overthrow our government. They aren't, at least not yet. They are working in collusion with our government to overthrow this nation's citizens and render us subservient. The government looks at islam as the goose that will lay the golden egg of an eternal socialist utopia... once all of the nonconformists are dealt with, by the refugees of course. The refugees view our government as one who will open the city's gates in the dark of night. The law will not help us avert the coming darkness. Count on it. The one thing the government didn't take into account is when choosing a monster to do your dirty work, make sure you're capable of putting said monster down when its work is done. I'm not sure they're up to the task.
DeleteThere are two things muslims hate more than America: bullets and bacon. Stock up on both.
S
Thank you for writing these great articles and trying to educate those not paying attention. One only has to look at the photos of the "refuges" to see many more young men than women and children, and most of those are crowded to the front, leaving the women behind. The be to set up refuge camps for the women and children and put those young men to protecting them.
ReplyDeleteThis is all done by design by Obama. It's part of his plan to bring America down.
ReplyDeleteA historical note:
ReplyDeleteIn XV century Spain, the losing faction in a fratricidal war thought it was a good idea to invite the Arabs to help them. Well, they came in, they saw the host´s weaknesses and they took over almost the whole country. It can be said that was a huge miscalculation. Given the lack of math skills rampant on the left, it wouldn´t surprise me if a similar miscalculation was about to happen.
Didn't Nazis find safe haven in Syria following WW2?
ReplyDeleteWell. That's very nice.
ReplyDeleteBut who exactly is supposed to tell the American government that we, the people, are going to have a say in who enters the US and who does not?
You know, I have no doubt, that the entire "refugee crisis" is not only orchestrated by leftist globalists (or their megalomaniacal IMF and CFR troglodytes) -- in league with the MB and various "religious" charities -- but is being used as a pretext to cow into submission any who dare to question the "court" narrative.
A first-rate and comprehensive analysis and breakdown of the facts and numbers. I'm posting this on my Facebook page and passing the URL around. Thanks, Daniel.
ReplyDeleteCouldn't it be said the federal government of the US also supports izlamic terrorism? After all, there's no accounting for where the billions of dollars being given to the PA and Pakistain are actually being spent is there? Especially not to the tax paying citizens of the USA.
ReplyDeleteA great analysis and data to back up what most of us that have a functioning brain and capacity to see past the DC and MSM smoke and mirrors have recognized for a long time. Too bad the MSM refuses to publish such data and continues to push the climate and gun control agendas.
ReplyDeleteWell, here we are and we now have what is shaping up to be a terrorist incident at a soft target in Southern California. The MSM and PC crowd (especially the POTUS) will bend over backwards to bury the facts & present this as a workplace violence and gun violence problem. The solution will be further chipping away at the liberties and rights of the law abiding citizen.
I am not sure how it will play out, but maybe too much ambient CO2 and the elevated average daily temperatures will no doubt be part of the problem. The problem will be guaranteed to NOT have anything to do with the religion that no one dare criticize let alone name. The average, law abiding citizen (especially if WASP) and their gun that never gets fired except for target shooting and deer hunting will somehow be the cause. I don't know, may be the shooters were offended by Christmas trees and "Merry Christmas."
By the way, have any Jews ever shot up a Christmas party? Have any Christians ever shot up any Eid celebrations? If they have, please let us know.
Oh yes, now back to the original topic for this essay. What was that, we need to bring in the people most likely to support ISIS? Not the Yazidis, Chaldeans, or Orthodox Christians that have been displaced, tortured, enslaved, and raped?
Yes, sure Mr. POTUS, please send us more people likely to go light up another place full of unarmed citizens.
Oh, and make us taxpayers pay to bring them here, feed, clothe, house, educate, and provide whatever else they request. Even though we could provide the same services over there at 1/5 the cost.
Merry Christmas, Happy Hanukah, and April Fools Day to all of us. This may turn out to be a very "interesting" holiday season. But I hope I am wrong.
To Anonymous above who postulated that the US is at least indirectly supporting Islamic terrorism.....in TABLETMAG there is an interesting article that points out that Obama's ultimate goal in the Middle East is to have the US completely withdraw from the area and have Russia and Iran dominate it instead. Since we know that Iran and the Assad regime in Syria quietly support ISIS in the hope of bringing about an internal Sunni civil war which the Iranian/Shi'ites hope will bring about a fatal weakening of the majority Sunni presence in Syria, Jordan and much of the rest of the Arab world and which will then allow the Iranians to step in, "clean up" and end up being the dominant Muslim force in the heart of the Arab/Muslim world.
ReplyDeleteIf this is the case, Obama would then NOT want to really weaken ISIS. The fact is that the large majority of sorties flown by American aircraft do not drop their munitions so Obama's supporters can then have it both ways....he is supposedly "fighting" ISIS by sending out the aircraft on bombing missions, yet they don't actually do anything against the ISIS enemy so he is not really doing anything against them. This makes Obama's policy whatever you want it to be, but in the end, he is helping ISIS.
darcy said...
ReplyDelete"But who exactly is supposed to tell the American government that we, the people, are going to have a say in who enters the US and who does not?"
WE the PEOPLE, that's who.
we can't necessarily prevent the government from letting people in (although I might argue their authority to do so)
but collectively, WE the people are well-equipped individuals, able to deal with the repercussions of such short-sighted decisions made by our government leaders(?)
and if you're not...get that way
@Y. Ben-David
ReplyDeleteI had thought ISIS was fighting against Shi'a forces in both Iraq and Syria?
How would ISIS foment a Sunni civil war, I had thought ISIS was a Sunni state?
There are also a good number of Syrian Christians. Despite being in far greater danger, our government are wildly favoring Muslim migrants ... I mean refugees.
ReplyDeleteStrict immigration reforms and such common sense things such as checking out young Muslims here on student VISAs. Are they actually enrolled in colleges? Just one measure. It's a lot better than the World War II alternative of interment camps for Japanese Americans. We can't put every Muslim in the US--born here or not--in interment camps, yet we can't allow our country to become a free range, tolerance makes nations peaceful concentration camps without walls.
ReplyDeleteI'm not sure which thread to post this in, but since this is about Syria and Islamic violence I'll post it here.
ReplyDeleteI found this new music video called Israeli Defense Forces: Not Our First Time Here, which was created in 2015. It features scenes of the IDF and is very well done. Posted by Lion of Zion. The song is in English (warning for language):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jhHqZJwRi_c
Just a smattering of the lyrics:
"They don't like, they don't like trouble, spray the fuck up. They don't trouble, spray the fuck up." I got the heart of a lion!"
"Nobody told me that the end was end. Tell that to yourself and tell it to a friend, and if that friend is a friend it'll slap you in the face and tell you, 'get your fucking mind straight!'
Sigh. The IDF has was it takes to defeat or at least make a serious dent in Islamic terrorist attacks but lately seem restrained to an insane degree by cries of using disproportionate force. As if you win a war with Islamic terrorists, including those with explicit charters like the Hamas Charter (modern equivalent of Mein Kampf).
The US is retrained with cries of tolerance, diversity etc. Both countries need to slap each other in the face and fight this. No doubt the US and France will launch another "war" arming "sympathetic" forces in these nations with our weapons that will ultimately be used against us.
The leadership of many of these Islamic middle east nations flips on a dime and yet we train and arm them expecting eternal loyalty from them.
We really need to crack down on immigration from Islamic nations and start investigating the immigrant status of people here. That, and Israel and the US doing what they need to and can in the middle east.
Hazak.
"Didn't Nazis find safe haven in Syria following WW2?"
ReplyDeleteI wouldn't doubt it. Europe was interesting in WW II--the perfect and weak bridge between the United States and the Middle East, and it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out what Hitler's priorities in the ME were.
Hmm, maybe I'm overlooking or the media isn't paying a great deal of attention to Islamic terrorism in South America. That was kind of a sweet spot for the Nazis after the war, off the radar for a while and if I'm not mistaken still has a pretty strong policy against sending foreign criminals to their home countries.
Complex stuff. But it is weird that we don't hear too much about Islamic terrorist attacks in South America.
Anyway, I wouldn't be surprised if Nazis fled to Syria after the war. It would seem like a safe harbor for people who liked killing off Jews.
In Buenos Aires in 1994, a Jewish community center was blown up and 85 people were killed. It was always suspected Iran was behind the bombings and when the Attorney General of Argentina was poised to indict senior members of the government of Argentina (incl. the current President), he mysteriously committed "suicide":
ReplyDeletehttp://www.haaretz.com/beta/1.654357
Fortunately in Canada, a large number of the most recent Syrian refugees arriving were Syrian Christians. I think Harper saw to that.
ReplyDeletePost a Comment